Just caught a clip of some “expert” being asked questions about the Mar-a-Lago investigation. This person spoke for 3 or 4 minutes without offering anything definitive or insightful. In fact, if I didn’t know better, she sounded like a Trump apologist, spewing the convoluted logic of saying that if Trump had better lawyers, he wouldn’t be in the (seeming) trouble he’s currently in…
I know that networks have their biases and anchors ask leading questions, but if that was the case here, the person being interviewed didn’t bite, didn’t offer up any juicy tidbits or confirm or corroborate anything. She was avoiding straightforward answers, basically saying that, negligence or intent aside, Trump and his advisors merely lacked cunning, lacked a strategy, a devious plan that would have given them an out and opened the door to avoiding the current bad press and attention being paid by the FBI.
I don’t think she offered the answers the anchor was looking for. It sounded more like she graduated Summa Cum Laude from the Donald Trump School of Circumvention and Getting Away with Shit.
3 Cents' 